Top videos

Kiatezua Lubanzadio Luyaluka
144 Views · 4 years ago

This video handles the issue of the transcendence of the Supreme Being in African traditional religion and shows its consequences in the practice of prayer and spiritual healing

Ọbádélé Kambon
87 Views · 5 years ago

Host: Gus T Renegade

Time: 28th May 2011

Synopsis: The Context of White Supremacy welcomes author and scholar, Dr. Chinweizu. We'll discuss his outstanding publications on the System of White Supremacy: Decolonizing The African Mind & The West & The Rest of Us. Dr. Chinweizu will deconstruct how White people use the Nobel Prize to refine their efforts - RACIAL SHOWCASING. Dr. Chinweizu will also offer his thoughts on the conflict in Libya. He contends that this turmoil does not represent the liberation of or concern for black people. Dr. Chinweizu will be joining us live from Ghana.

The C.O.W.S broadcast , hosted by Gus T Renegade.Is engineered for non-white people,/ Victims of Racism, White Supremacy. This broadcast is dedicated to sharing constructive information on what White Supremacy/Racism is and how it works. We exchange views with White People, Admitted Racists, and non-white people on the global enterprise of White Supremacy/Terrorism.

INVEST in The COWS – paypal.me/GusTRenegade

Amazon Wish List https://www.amazon.com/gp/regi....stry/wishlist/1RC7IB

CALL IN NUMBER: 641.715.3640 CODE 564943#

The C.O.W.S. archives: http://tiny.cc/76f6p

https://soundcloud.com/rwswj/tracks

To check out The C.O.W.S.

Website: http://racism-notes.blogspot.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RWSWJ

Twitter: https://twitter.com/untiljustice

To check out earlier C.O.W.S. programs:

https://archive.org/details/TheCowsRa...

https://archive.org/details/Th....eCowsRadioShow/001-t

Ọbádélé Kambon
25 Views · 10 months ago

CONFERENCE - Retrospective - History, Context and Impact of Ancestor Malcolm X

Kwabena Ofori Osei
104 Views · 4 years ago

The Battle of Isandlwana on 22 January 1879 was the first major encounter in the Anglo-Zulu War between the British Empire and the Zulu Kingdom. Eleven days after the British commenced their invasion of Zululand in South Africa, a Zulu force of some 20,000 warriors attacked a portion of the British main column consisting of about 1,800 British, colonial and native troops and perhaps 400 civilians.

The Zulus were equipped mainly with the traditional assegai iron spears, iklwa and cow-hide shields, but also had a number of muskets and old rifles though they were not formally trained in their use.

Ọbádélé Kambon Subscription
69 Views · 1 year ago

⁣Ɔsebɔ, ɔkraman ne odwan: ma w'ani nsɔ

Ambakisye-Okang Dukuzumurenyi
60 Views · 5 years ago

Words of Mhenga Malcolm X

Ọbádélé Kambon
102 Views · 3 years ago

⁣Making mud blocks with Kwaku

Ambakisye-Okang Dukuzumurenyi
64 Views · 5 years ago

HAPI Talks Vodun with Dr. Bayyinah Bello and other African Traditional Religions

Please visit www.hapifilm.com to get a copy of the Groundbreaking documentary film HAPI and all the latest HAPI gear.

Don't forget to LIKE, SHARE & SUBSCRIBE to our channel so that we can continue to bring you excellent programming.

Cash app: $hapifilm

Ọbádélé Kambon
45 Views · 1 year ago

⁣Kambon morning rituals

Kwabena Ofori Osei
26 Views · 11 months ago

1. "Almost everything we know about Ancient Egypt comes from their belief in L.I.F.E. AFTER DEATH. It may surprise you, you know, you've all seen temples, you've all seen the tombs, we don't have cities, the ancient Egyptian cities weren't meant to last forever. They really believed that you were going to go on forever, so why not put your money in your tombs and your temples which are for eternity, so their houses had to last for only one generation. So we don't have ancient Egyptian cities, just temples, tombs, and artifacts from those tombs. Now the only reason we have coffins, is because they wanted to protect the body fro eternity, now the notion that they had was R.E.S.U.R.R.E.C.T.I.O.N.; the Egyptians believed NOT IN REINCARNATION as some 'New Agers' say, but in R.E.S.U.R.R.E.C.T.I.O.N.. They believed that the body was literally going to get up and go again in the next world, and that's why you had to preserve it."
Dr. Robert Brier (PhD, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)one of the world's foremost experts on mummies. Senior Research Fellow in the Department of Philosophy at the C.W. Post Campus of Long Island University,2. "After the Greeks (and thus the Romans) were CIVILIZED BY THE AFRICANS IN EGYPT most of what we now know as 'Europe' was still barbaric, and unheard of. There was really NO EUROPE in ancient times......and Europe as we know it was divided by the Rhine-Danube frontier, south and west of which lay the civilized provinces of the empire, and north and east the ''BARBARIANS' of whom the civilized world KNEW ALMOST NOTHING"A HISTORY OF THE MODERN WORLDR.R. Palmer (Prof. Yale University)and Joel Colton (Prof. of History at Duke University)

Blaxit
32 Views · 6 years ago

Footage from the first Young African Leaders Awards which was held in Gambia.

Check out: www.bla-xit.com

This video was recorded and edited by Makonnen Sankofa. Subscribe to Makonnen's YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCiP8DHZ_eEFLJdOn7

We're appealing for donors, sponsors and paid endorsements so we can continue to produce content. bopcollective@yahoo.com

Thanks to all our Bla Xit donors.

Become a Bla Xit Messenger (Subscribers only) by sending your video clip to blaxithome@gmail.com

Special thanks to our friend and YouTube Vlogger Wode Maya for helping to set-up the Bla Xit channel. You can follow him on YouTube too https://www.youtube.com/user/MrGhanaBaby

Baka Omubo
49 Views · 3 years ago

⁣Maat is our focus for 2023

Nana
27 Views · 10 months ago

Burkina Faso’s government just made a series of bold, coordinated decisions that could redefine its future. In a single council meeting, the country addressed education, security, justice, and economic reform, without foreign aid. What happened wasn’t routine policy. It was the quiet launch of a national transformation with continental implications.The council didn’t emerge with fanfare. But what it left behind was a series of decisions that read less like routine governance and more like a strategic reset. Not reactionary, not symbolic — these were operational shifts, the kind that tell you a country is not only paying attention to its problems but is finally choosing to solve them. As the African Diaspora saying goes, "I am because we are, and we are because I am."Join this channel to get access to perks:

Kwabena Ofori Osei
24 Views · 1 year ago

Whether you're a believer or non-believer, when confronting bible slavery, don't let anyone throw up this ridiculous smokescreen that says that the slavery instituted in the old testament was so completely different to, say, pre-civil war US slavery.

———————————————
Website and blog: never updated, but http://www.nonstampcollector.com
Bluesky: @nonstampcollector (I basically quit Twitter/X.)
PATREON: http://www.patreon.com/nonstampcollector
AD: Hell isn't real, but hard drive crashes and computer thefts are. I've been using Backblaze online backup for longer than I've been on Youtube. I fear neither hell nor total data loss. Try it here: https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-backup/#af3049 .
It's the only thing I've ever advertised, and I'm proud to do so knowing that it will very likely truly save someone's ass someday. Maybe yours.
——————————————

The usual tactic is to throw facts and rules about Israelite indentured servitude around, to throw you off the scent of a Yahweh-mandated form of slavery EVERY BIT as bad as anything we've seen in recent centuries. This line of argument is so prevalent that I'm confused as to whether its proponents actually believe it or not; but either way, this video is my attempt to inject a bit of reality into this very important area of discussion.
The god of the bible mandated oppressive life-long slavery of foreigners - pretty much a concise description of one of the worst forms of human rights abuses the world has ever had to grapple with. It's as simple as that.
No, I don't hate God for mandating slavery, and no I don't believe that God is evil for mandating slavery. I don't believe that THIS god, the absurd god of the bible, is even extant, let alone worthy of any adjectives beyond that! This god's inhumane and ridiculously cruel commands say nothing about the god that they are ascribed to, simply because they are so obviously ascribed to a god by the men in whose image this god was made.
Deal with it folks; your god is the brainchild of some particularly awful humans. The bible simply and clearly gets this very easy human rights question utterly wrong.
Abandon it, and keep looking for answers. You'll be ever so glad you did.


Thanks to Tim R. for coding the English subtitle track.

Thanks to those who responded to my blog post requesting help with reading materials. Special thanks to Dr. B Cargill (Asst Prof. of Classics and Religious Studies, UOI) for valuable guidance in the final stages of writing, and for the "job creators" line!

Amongst other sources I used:

Avalos, H. (2011) "Slavery, Abolitionism and the Ethics of Biblical Scholarship: Reflections about Ethical Deflections"
Accessed Dec 2012 at http://www.bibleinterp.com/art....icles/ava358013.shtm

Copan, P. (2011) "Does the Old Testament Endorse Slavery? An Overview". Enrichment, Spring 2011

Jewish Virtual Library. (2008) "Slavery: Biblical Law"
Accessed January 2012 at http://www.jewishvirtuallibrar....y.org/jsource/judaic

Path Of The Beagle (blog) has an informative series on Bible slavery, starting here:
http://pathofthebeagle.com/201....1/09/10/invitation-t

Unbelievable? Episode: "Does the Bible condone slavery?" 19 June, 2010.Debate: David Instone-Brewer, vs. Bob Price. Moderator: Justin Brierley
Accessed and available via iTunes podcast.

Deem, R (2011) "Does God Approve of Slavery According to the Bible?"
http://www.godandscience.org/a....pologetics/slavery_b

Section 1 of the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution reads:
"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

I had to leave out "male and female" in my recounting of Lev 25:45-47; I had a gag about Yahweh being an equal-opportunity enslaver but it got taken out along the way, and it flowed within the video much better with that left out.
———————————————
website and blog: http://www.nonstampcollector.com
twitter: http://www.twitter.com/nonstampNSC
——————————————---

Nana
27 Views · 4 months ago

Are Africa’s leaders working for their own people — or for foreign powers? That question is back at the center of West African politics after a striking move by Burkina Faso’s President, Ibrahim Traoré. At a recent summit in Niger, Traoré publicly ruled out the membership of two West African states in the fledgling Sahel Confederation and signaled which country might be next in line to join. The announcement caught many by surprise because it wasn’t just about borders or diplomacy — it was a deliberate political statement about influence, independence, and who gets to shape the region’s future.The Sahel Confederation currently brings together Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger — countries that share deep social, cultural and economic ties. Traoré’s stated vision is to build a confederation grounded in those commonalities: a bloc of states with similar development levels and cultural frameworks that can cooperate on security, economics and self-determination. In his view, cohesion depends on parity; admitting states with very different economic structures, or those too enmeshed with outside powers, would risk reproducing old hierarchies and opening the door to external economic domination.Put bluntly, Traoré argued that some prospective members are too tightly bound to foreign interests — and that their inclusion would import the very inequalities and elite capture the Confederation is meant to reject. He framed his stance as an anti-imperial, grassroots commitment: no more arrangements that let outside actors extract wealth while leaving ordinary citizens poor. That’s why, according to his remarks at the summit, certain countries were turned away — not because of geography, but because of economics, political alignments, and the danger of repeating patterns of economic exploitation.Many observers point to the broader logic behind this move: Traoré wants a union that protects member states from neo-colonial pressures, especially those that perpetuate French economic influence in the region. By prioritizing cultural and economic affinity and by insisting on independence from external control, he hopes to prevent the Confederation from becoming another channel for foreign elites to consolidate power.That said, the explanation raises questions that still need answering. Which two countries did Traoré exclude, precisely why were they rejected, and what criteria will be used going forward to admit new members? The answers matter because they will determine whether the Sahel Confederation becomes a model of regional solidarity and self-reliance — or simply reshapes old rivalries under a new banner.In short: Traoré’s announcement is more than a diplomatic decision. It’s a political test — a claim that West African unity must be built on shared development goals and freedom from outside economic manipulation. Whether that vision holds, and how other regional capitals respond, will shape the Sahel’s political landscape for years to come.Add your voice to the total liberation of Africa by leaving a comment in the comments section below. Do not forget to like and subscribe for more informative videos like this one. Let’s proceed.From the 1840s until its independence in 1960, Côte d’Ivoire — then known as Ivory Coast — remained under French colonial rule. But independence didn’t mean separation. Decades later, France’s deep political and economic ties still shape the country’s direction and, in many ways, explain its absence from the newly forming Sahel Confederation.France’s involvement in the region dates back centuries. As early as 1637, French missionaries were operating near the Gold Coast. By 1687, they had established a mission, and by 1701, they built a fort to strengthen their foothold. Then, during the Scramble for Africa, France formalized its control — declaring Ivory Coast a protectorate in 1843 and turning it into a full colony by 1893. What followed was a long era of French expansion and dominance, marked by aggressive efforts to reshape Ivorian society.#IbrahimTraoré #sahelconfederation #aes #westafricapolitics #africaunity #burkinafasonews #geopoliticsafrica

KoJoe
39 Views · 5 years ago

Powerful Sangoma




Showing 55 out of 329