- General Videos
- Music
- Economics
- Health
- Travel & Events
- History
- Psychology
- Spirituality
- Movies
- News & Politics
- Kmtyw Combat Sciences
- Ɔbenfo Ọbádélé Kambon Videos
- Ɔbenfoɔ Kamau Kambon: Black Liberation Philosophy
- Science, Tech, Engineering and Math
- Permaculture
- Self-Sustainability
- Living Off Grid
- Yoruba Language Learning
- Education
- Mmɔfra Adesua
- Nana Kamau Kambon Playlist
- Livestream
- Komplementarity Kouples and Revolutionary Singles
- Abibitumi Film Series
- Decade of Our Repatriation
- Live
Africa Did Not Create the Transatlantic Slave Trade; Europe's Demand for African Slaves Did
The idea that “Africans sold Africans” has been repeated so often that people treat it like complete history, when it is anything but. It strips away context and forces a modern racial reading onto a pre-colonial African world that did not organise itself around European ideas of race. Africa was not one people and it was not one identity. It was made up of kingdoms, empires, nations and ethnic groups with their own political systems, cultures and interests. So when conflict happened, it was not “Black people selling Black people” in the way that phrase is now used. It was political conflict between distinct societies, just as Europe had its own wars between rival states and kingdoms.
What Europe created through the transatlantic slave trade was something different in scale, structure and purpose. This was not simply an extension of local wars. It was a racialised, hereditary and industrial system built for profit, conquest and extraction. European demand drove it, expanded it and turned human beings into global commodities on a scale the world had not seen before. That is why the “Africans sold Africans” argument is not serious history. It is a lazy deflection that avoids naming Europe’s central role in designing, racialising and profiting from the transatlantic slave trade.