For the 2019 Donald H. Smith Memorial Lecture at Baruch College of the City University of New York, Kean University Professor James Conyers delivered an eye-opening lecture: Before Garvey: The Philosophy and Opinions of Edward Wilmot Blyden.
We know it was extraordinary because theBrother captured it on his mobile device.

Crypto Currency /BitCoin CONTRIBUTIONS:
722fce22-5e9f-42fc-a378-2da90f5d267a

This is a powerful posting by theBrother as he finishes his interview with Dr. James L. Conyers on the topic of one of the progenitors of Pan Africanism, Edward Wilmot Blyden.

Crypto Currency /BitCoin CONTRIBUTIONS:
722fce22-5e9f-42fc-a378-2da90f5d267a

In this segment Oggi asks Dr Williams about the effect of drugs on the African liberation movement. Dr. Williams describes it as an organized deliberate effort to destroy the Black community...which ultimately failed.

Dr. Williams discusses the women's liberation movement and its effect on the Black cause.

In this segment of Strongmen, Oggi asks Dr. Williams about the African family and the role of the family group in the rebirth of African civilization.

Dr. Williams explains the Oreo as a symbol of a Black head with a white mind; the greatest hindrance to the unification of African people.

Dr. Chancellor Williams describes the process of acculturation, which Africans worldwide have been subjected to a "white mind transplant."

The result has some people of African ancestry looking on Africa with scorn. Dr. Williams goes on to describe the greatest victory of the white world as being the conquest of the Black man's mind.

The acculturation process tried to blot out the African's knowledge of self and create an illusion were all things African were savage. Any noble African tradition was to be dropped as pagan.

This is the first segment in a series of conversations between Dr. Chancellor James Williams and his research assistant Oggi Ogburn at Dr. Williams' home in Washington, DC.

JESUS NEVER EXISTED

⁣Christianity without Jesus?

Jesus Never Existed - A Crackpot Idea?

In a culture based upon Christianity the denial of Jesus' existence may appear at first glance absurd or even stupid. After all, goes the argument, "mainstream scholarship" accepts that there was an historical Jesus, even if there is no agreement as to actually who he was, precisely when he was, what he did or what he said.
Yet for more than 200 years a minority of courageous scholars have dared to question the existence of Jesus. Their scepticism and outright denial of the historical figure of Jesus is not the result of perverse obduracy in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Rather, it is a rational response to the dearth of evidence and an honest riposte to more than a suspicion of fabrication...